Whats Hot

VEHICLE SAFETY COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATION SCHEME 24 FEB 2012


28. February 2012 07:44
http://www.rta.nsw.gov.au/registration/downloads/bulletin_1_v10_24_02_2012.pdf

cars

Motor Enthusiasts Conference - Duncan Gay


28. February 2012 07:35

cars

ACMC & the Enthusiasts Conference


27. February 2012 07:03

https://sites.google.com/site/no2vsccs/1-the-legal-position/acmc-the-enthusiasts-conference

 

ACMC & the Enthusiasts Conference

The ACMC held an Enthusiasts Conference at Eastern Creek on Sunday 26th February where the Minister and the RTA/RMS met with delegates, made a number of announcements and an swered questions.

Following the conference the ACMC issued this statement:

Today’s inaugural Motor Enthusiast Conference was a phenomenal success and we would like to thank all of the conference delegates and car show participants for their enthusiastic contribution.

Over 160 delegates had the opportunity to engage with the Minister and senior members of the RMS whilst outside hundreds of enthusiast cars were on display.

In attendance at the conference were:

  • Minister for Roads & Ports, Hon Duncan Gay MLC,
  • Senior Policy Advisor – Mr Andrew Huckel,
  • Acting Director for Customer and Compliance Services – Mr Peter Wells,
  • Deputy Director General for Policy and Regulation, Transport NSW – Mr Tim Reardon,
  • Principle Manager Roads, Registration and Licencing at Transport for NSW – Mr Terry Hickey
  • Manager Regulatory Scheme Policy, RMS – Mr Ken Cleary
  • RMS Vehicle Inspector – Mr Greame Snell,
  • Street Machine Magazine Editor - Geoff Seddon,

And

  •  
    • NSW Nationals Party Executive and Conference Chairman – Mr Alan Hay

NSW Nationals Senator John Williams also came alone to show his support for the Motor Enthusiast Community.

The key aspects of Minister Gay’s speech included the following announcements:-

  • Section 55A of the ‘Road Transport (Vehicle Registration) Regulation 2007’ reinstating the relevance of ancillary documents and alternative options to meet compliance.
  • A respected member of the Motor Enthusiast Community to be appointed to the Safety Board that reports to the Minister
  • A new working group is to be formed in order to review outstanding issues pertaining to standards, legislation and implementation and reporting to the Safety Board. The Working Group is to have representation from the Motor Enthusiast Community, Signatories, RMS, Transport for NSW and NSW Police.
  • The ‘abridged’ break test is not to be mandatory but at the discretion of the Certifier
  • The ‘abridged’ break test is to be forwarded to the new working group for review; the Minister insists that any resolution must be safe, practical and affordable.
  • It is not intended that electronic stability control be mandatory on vehicles that do not already have an ESC.
  • When a dispute arises over the originality of pre ADR components a panel incorporating the Motor Enthusiast Community will be formed to report their findings to the RMS
  • VSI 50 will be forwarded to the new working group for resolution
  • VSB14 and VSI 59 will be forwarded to the new working group for resolution
  • Following 8+ years of stagnation the ‘National Guidelines for Street-Rod Modification & Construction’ will be forwarded to the new working group for resolution

It has been a historic day for the Motor Enthusiast Community and a new proactive relationship has been entered into with the RMS. There is still much work to be done but we are confident that within this new environment of consultation we can achieve our goals.

In recognition of his unparalleled contribution to the Motor Enthusiast Community; Conference Chairman Alan Hay was appointed Patron of the Australian Confederation of Motor Clubs. Congratulations Alan!

The RMS have provided documented answers to the questions submitted which will be available on the ACMC website on Tuesday.

A video recording of the morning session of Conference will be available on YouTube this evening.

Once again, thank you all for your continued support.

NSW GOV MODS TO REGISTERED VEHICLES


10. February 2012 06:03

 

 

NO TO VSCCS?

 

 

 

By Jeremy Braithwaite & Trevor Booth

In December 2011 the RTA, or RMS as they would prefer to be known, quietly killed off the old Engineering Signatory Scheme (ECS) and replaced it with a new scheme called VSCCS. The changes were made by way of an amendment to the Road Transport (Vehicle Registration) Regulations 2007 and did not therefore receive any parliamentary debate.

There are three separate areas of impact:

• The legislation which applies to all motorists who modify their vehicle in any way

• The appointment of certifiers

• The technical standards to which those certifiers are bound

The Legislation

The previous engineering codes of practice for light and heavy vehicles were removed from the legislation and the following was added:

[3] Clause 55A

 

Insert after clause 55:

55A Modifications to registered vehicles

A person must not carry out modifications on a registered vehicle (whether by the addition or removal of components or otherwise) that results in the vehicle failing to comply with the applicable vehicle standards.

Additional clauses in Division 2 of the regulation were introduced which allowed the Authority to gazette 'Significant modifications to vehicles' and specified that vehicles thus modified should not be used on the road unless they had been certified under the VSCCS scheme.

It is implied that only modifications that have been gazetted would therefore fall under Clause 55A above; however another interpretation of this clause is that it stands alone and there is nothing in Division 2 which relieves the 'person' of his or her responsibility to ensure that their vehicle at all times complies with the 'applicable vehicle standards'. These are of course the Australian Design Rules which are applicable to all post 1972 vehicles. These are contained in Schedule 2.

At this point in time the Authority (RTA/RMS) has not gazetted the list of modifications, so the only current interpretation that can be made is that all modifications require certification.

We have documented all aspects of the VSCCS scheme and its impact on different users on a website:

https://sites.google.com/site/no2vsccs/home

The website also contains a link to the Channel 10 News feature that went to air before Xmas featuring Trevor Booth.

Our site lists some of the modifications that, in our view, have been impacted by the introduction of the VSCCS. As even items such as seats in ambulances are impacted, it is hard to believe that the status quo will be allowed to remain for too long!

We are looking for clarification on this, and a number of other points. When such clarification is received, it will be published on the above site and its associated blog. In this way the site can serve as a clearing house for accurate information.

A final point to understand in relation to the legislation is that the 'Authority' can in the future add any item it wishes to the Gazetted List, again with no parliamentary scrutiny or advanced warning to the public. You will need to decide whether you are comfortable with this situation before you embark on a project, such as outfitting a 4WD for bush touring or restoring a car. In the latter instance you may not be able to refit the original period modifications and accessories, to the detriment of your car's history and authenticity.

The Appointment of Certifiers

The engineers operating under the ECS scheme were given approx 10 days notice to close down their business. They then had the choice of re-applying for the new scheme and many have chosen not to do so.

The Authority may argue that they had been discussing the new scheme for a long time - over 10 years in various forms - but the transitional arrangements have been ill considered and people who had embarked on major projects such as building a replica or an Individually Constructed Vehicle in RTA/RMS parlance can be in the position where they have paid one certifier to certify the build and cannot complete the project with that certifier.

There is no agreed procedure to hand the project over from the old ECS engineer to the new VSCCS Certifier, and we are hoping that this can be rectified in the future.

So in summary, more vehicles will require certification, but as things stand at present there are fewer people to do the work.

The Technical Standards

Many of the stakeholders including the ACMC, the CMC, the other car club groups, and a number of industry associations held discussions with the RTA/RMS in the period leading up to the introduction of the VSCCS and everyone that we have spoken to was under the impression that the NSW government would introduce VSB14 into the legislation together with some NSW specific additions. VSB14 is the National Code of Practice for Light Vehicle Construction and Modification. It is a guide for Modifiers as opposed to Certifiers and it was expected it would replace the Light Vehicle Code of Practice (LVCOP) which together with VSB6 was enshrined in the previous legislation. VSB6 is the code of practice for heavy vehicles.

Instead both were removed along with a large number of other technical documents; the full list appears here:

https://sites.google.com/site/no2vsccs/1-the-legal-position/changes-to-codes-or-practice

It had been intended to also introduce a new technical standard for Certifiers. We believe this may happen, but to date it has not. So the issue for the certifiers that have signed up for the new scheme is that they no longer have any alternate technical document to demonstrate compliance to the ADR's and other requirements of Schedule 2. Their only legal option is to adopt the whole of the technical requirements and extensive testing regime of the ADR's. This would include crash testing for ICV's.

If they depart from the requirements of Schedule 2, and there is evidence that the RMS has encouraged this, then they may be assuming liabilities in the event of a claim. This highlights the entire issue of certifier liability to a new level; it is in itself a sensitive issue as the 'Authority' has introduced its own Professional Indemnity Insurance scheme.

The status quo also means that the Modifier of a vehicle has no legislated technical document upon which to base his modifications. And if we refer back to Clause 55A we will see that the modifier may be the person who is persecuted under this legislation. That could be the person who fits the bull bar to your 4WD or those upgraded callipers to your Jaguar.

We have raised these concerns with the RTA/RMS and await their response. When and if this is received it will be posted on our web site.

Introducing the ACMC

A large number of car clubs in this state are members of the Council of Motor Clubs (CMC). This organisation in its turn is a member of a new group called the Australian Confederation of Motor Clubs which has moved very quickly and organised an event at Eastern Creek on 26th February. Details will appear on the ACMC web site and if your club is affiliated with this organisation you should receive a flyer.

The ACMC is encouraging all member clubs to attend the event and to discuss their participation and the reasons for it with their local member and with their local press.

Hoping to see everyone at Eastern Creek. We have a blog page which will post developments and which also allows you a place to add your own comments:

http://no2vsccs.blogspot.com.au/

Jeremy Braithwaite is a Committee Member of the Thoroughbred Sports Car Club and member of a number of other car clubs.

Trevor Booth is a senior engineer who was a member of the ECS scheme.

 

The History of Muscle Cars in America


10. February 2012 05:21
The muscle car era in the United States occurred roughly from 1964 to 1972. No one person is responsible for developing factory production cars powered by massive performance V-8 engines that led to the creation of the muscle car, but Pontiac chief engineer John DeLorean was an early pioneer. DeLorean and his team produced the high-powered 1964 Pontiac GTO that defined the future of the muscle car. Muscle Car Defined A muscle car is a midsize coupe or hardtop equipped with a large block V-8 engine. It's often confused with a pony car. According to musclecarclub.com, a stock Ford Mustang, for example, is identified as a pony car. But the Mustang Mach 1, GT and Boss models equipped with performance engines are considered muscle cars. The Beginning In a bit of irony that can only be dreamed up in a Dilbert comic, General Motors management indirectly created the muscle car by banning GM cars from National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing competition in 1963. GM also banned factory-installed engine sizes above 330 cubic inches, according to Hemmings Muscle Machines. GM engineers conspired to circumvent the ban. Enter John DeLorean The car that started it all: The 1964 Pontiac GTO. In 1963, Pontiac's DeLorean, Russ Gee and Bill Collin decided to take the Pontiac Tempest family car and fit it with a 389-cubic-inch V-8. It was equipped with a four-barrel carburetor and generated 325 horsepower. DeLorean skirted the GM ban by offering the 389-cubic-inch "Super Tempest," later to be called the GTO, as an option only and with an initial production of only 5,000 units, according to Hemmings and web-cars.com. Super Sport The 1968 Chevrolet Camaro Super Sport convertible. By the time the GTO hit the market, Chevrolet was already producing its performance Super Sport models with the compact Nova. The Super Sport was introduced in 1961 primarily as an appearance package, according to musclecarclub.com. Although all Super Sports today are considered muscle cars, the 1963 Nova SS was only powered by a small-block 283-cubic-inch V-8. The exception was the 1961 Impala SS powered by a 348-cubic-inch V-8. However, the Impala SS predated GM's ban on big V-8s and was a full-size car. Mustang Versus Camaro The 1967 Shelby Mustang GT350. Pony cars are essentially midsize stock production coupes with modestly powered engines. The standard Mustang and Camaro fit into this category, according to musclecarclub.com and web-cars.com. Yet these two cars are perhaps most responsible for igniting the Ford/Chevrolet muscle car wars. Retired race driver Carroll Shelby developed the performance Shelby Mustang GT350 and GT500s, while Chevrolet produced its Camaro SS and Z28 performance packages. Dodge Dodge, a division of Chrysler, perhaps best embraced the muscle car concept in the late 1960s with several models. It developed a performance package, the R/T, for the Challenger, Charger, the compact Dart and full-size Coronet with 383 or 440-cubic-inch V-8s, according to musclecarclub.com. Demise The oil embargo of 1973 stopped the muscle car era dead in its tracks. Gas prices skyrocketed. The U.S. government implemented a series of strict safety and emissions regulations that doomed the big-block V-8. Americans turned to fuel-efficient Japanese imports, prompting Detroit automakers to downsize their cars and engine horsepower, according to Fortune magazine.

cars